One of the things I’m most excited about in Lightning Web Components is the ability to write Unit Tests for the components.
The unit testing framework of choice is Jest, and it looks well suited. Not least it’s the framework of choice for Facebook, and describes itself as well suited to React apps. Why should that matter? Well, React is a 1-way bound Javascript framework - and so is LWC.
So I was looking forward to get into Unit Testing, following the documentation for testing wired components
Unfortunately, the documentation didn’t work out for me, and it looked like there’s a couple of mistakes in there:
The example ‘getRecord.json’ file isn’t valid JSON.
In order for the file to work, the field names need to be surrounded in double quotes.
I.E. Instead of:
// getRecord.json { fields: { Name: { value: "DYNAMO X1" } } }
The file should be:
// getRecord.json { "fields": { "Name": { "value": "DYNAMO X1" } } }
Interrogating the ‘element’ for its state does not seem to work.
Instead, I found that I needed to get data from the document object.
I.E. The following does not work:
// Resolve a promise to wait for a rerender of the new content. return Promise.resolve().then(() => { const content = element.querySelector('.content'); expect(content.textContent).toBe("Name:DYNAMO X1"); });
But the following does:
// Resolve a promise to wait for a rerender of the new content. return Promise.resolve().then(() => { const content = document.body.querySelector('.content'); expect(content.textContent).toBe("Name:DYNAMO X1"); });
Mocking doesn't seem to work for Apex, only LDS
From the quick test I did, I could get the mocking framework to work for the Lightning Data Service, once my implementation of the example was tweaked. However, I couldn't get it to work with an imported Apex method
I didn't see a reference to this being missing, though I guess I may have just missed that, and I know that the recommendation is to use LDS whenever you can. I just worry that there's a really important use case out there - it seems natural to me that components that use custom Apex are likely to be more complex than ones that use LDS. And with that in mind, it feels like missing Apex will be a big loss to the testing framework.
Hopefully the last part is already known about, is a bit of missing documentation, or is simply that I misunderstood something.
Whatever the case, I plan on doing more investigations into the Unit Testing capabilities, and will obviously blog my findings - but I have to admit that I found the initial experience a little disappointing after the extremely polished experience up to now.
I sincerely hope that it isn’t an indicator that Unit Testing is bit of an after-thought.
Update - 20/12/18
It felt like a good avenue for exploring testing would be to put together a test for the "message" component that I put together for the blog post on re-usable components
Unfortunately, I stumbled on this block. I was able to pretty quickly write a test that proved that @api properties were rendered properly in the resulting HTML, but I couldn't find a way of setting the value the slot. Adding a textNode as a child of the built node is blocked (seemingly by LWC), with an error that appears to suggest it can be worked around. But with no substantial documentation yet available, it feels like I'm just shooting in the dark
When I couple that with the fact that the git repo for the ebikes app seems to only contain one set of tests for the productFilter component, I'm stating to take the hint that unit testing hasn't been explored by the team fully yet.
I think it's entirely understandable, and I still hope that this area will be fleshed out significantly in the coming weeks, but the first impression remains - not yet
2 comments:
Great feedback. We're working on adding tests for most recipes in https://github.com/trailheadapps/lwc-recipes which guide people to common practices and best patterns. The docs will also be updated in the coming weeks with corrections and clarifications.
This is fantastic (and very exciting) news. Having a set of resources such as the recipes will prove invaluable, I'm sure. Looking forward to reviewing the results...
Post a Comment